Can you break the laws of physics

One Singular Sensation. Quantum Entanglement: Slower Than Light. Engineering Problems. Extraordinary Claims. Neutrinos From Outer Space!

At Least There Is Symmetry. To break the laws of physics is simply to do something not currently supported by the human understanding of the behavior of the universe. It is physics that allows everything in the universe to occur.

That being said, it is possible to do something we didn't at first think possible, however to do something not supported by physics is impossible because physics is the basis of everything. Physics is and are what it is and are and the human cannot change that.

Scientists have done like lots and lots of research and found certain things that have been proven those ideas. This is very hard to change, if not impossible for the human race.

This is the way it is and this can and will not be changes in the future. You can't break the laws of physics but we can get information about the laws incorrect. Laws can be revised and corrected but you can't really break the laws of physics. To figure out what lies beyond the Standard Model, physicists have long tried to push it to its breaking point in lab experiments. However, the theory has stubbornly passed test after test, including years of high-energy measurements at the Large Hadron Collider LHC , which in found a particle that had been predicted by the Standard Model: the Higgs boson , which plays a key role in giving mass to some other particles.

The muon is just about the perfect particle to monitor for signs of new physics. On the quantum scale—the scale of individual particles—slight energy fluctuations manifest as pairs of particles that pop in and out of existence, like suds in a vast bubble bath. If the universe contains additional heavy particles, for example, they would tweak the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon—possibly even enough to measure in the lab.

The Muon g-2 experiment starts with a beam of muons, which scientists make by smashing pairs of protons together and then carefully filtering through the subatomic debris. This muon beam then enters a ton magnetic ring that originally was used in the Brookhaven experiment, shipped by barge and truck from Long Island to Illinois in At the same time, scientists had to make the best Standard Model prediction possible.

This change tweaked the data by an unknown amount that would be corrected for only after the analysis was complete. The only records of this clock-shifting random number were on two handwritten pieces of paper that were kept in locked cabinets at Fermilab and the University of Washington in Seattle.

In some of the proposed theories that thread this needle, the universe contains several types of Higgs bosons, not just the one included in the Standard Model. The experiment monitors short-lived particles called B mesons and tracks how they decay. The Standard Model predicts that some of these decaying particles spit out pairs of muons. But LHCb has found evidence that these muon-spawning decays occur less often than predicted, with odds of a fluke in the experiment at roughly one in a thousand.

The fine structure constant describes the force that influences subatomic particles with electrical charge, like how protons and electrons within an atom are drawn to one another. The study, published Friday in the journal Science Advances , found that the number seemed to change when they analyzed extremely distant quasars — but only when they looked in certain directions, meaning that the laws of physics may break down at the edges of the universe.

As it stands right now, our models for the universe assume that it expands outward in all directions like an ever-growing blob of galaxies and other starstuff.

If this new study is correct, however, it instead presents a universe with a dipole structure, not unlike the North and South poles of a magnet. Care about supporting clean energy adoption?