What is the difference between t4i and t3i
Exposures are generally good, and white balance is most often correct. Of course Nikon is good also. Pretty every manufacturer today makes excellent cams.
The same guy that made the SL1 gear of the year. Actually it's larger then the d becouse of the new collapsible kit lens. Which i could not not show you. The website doesn't have it yet. A remarkable show of complete and utter laziness from canon. None of them are best for travel. Some facts please. I believe OP is that way also.
Other reviews are also positive about IQ. Many of those at least mention that SL1 cam is on par with competition. Okay, there are choices.
So what. Lolski, that DxO It depends on usage. This makes huge difference to skip on many strong points of competition. It might be surprising that there are also some weak points or just personal preference. No the lens doesn't make the Canon crap. The 5 year old sensor baked on a absolete nm node is doing that. Then you have the crappy 50mm from canon vs the very good 50mm f1.
So the D is more expensive by a little bit. You can buy an D for close to nothing these days. In what aspect is the Canon system better as the nikon system. I know some long prime lenses but those are hardly relevant with Dslr's in this price range.
I agree that m43 is a better travel companion. The Olympus Em or GX7 are good alternatives though. I fell asleep. SL1 still has lower height and width. Hope what is that maybe 1. In some dimensions still smaller.
With that old Nikon lens Canon is also ligher. No dual pixel sensors before. Anyway we talk about image quality and noise performance here, not about other capabilities. That way you must understand that L lenses in hand versus G lenses in some shop is not the same for me.
This is why we ask OPs many questions, his current gear, possibilities etc, and it can turn out that small image quality difference is nothing compared to OPs situation.
I can buy new SL1 with the same price difference no matter what. Still very cheap, especially with only IS kit lens. Subjective views, especially if there are many of them give us a perspective that is based on real live experiences with camera equipment rather than a view that is based on scientific tests done in a lab by a professional reviewer.
There is another great source to tap into for research on the Canon t3i vs t4i debate. There is not enough time in the day to evaluate all of the cameras and accessories myself as a one man operation. I also gather and evaluate the reviews and opinions by the common everyday snap photographers and photo enthusiasts who have a large combined amount of time using their photography cameras, lenses, lighting gadgets, and related camera accessories.
If you've read more than a few of my posts on the Canon Camera Geek site, you know I am an Amazon addict, not only has a frequent buyer but also as a committed reader. What have I purchased? Nutritional products, a ton of books, gifts for friends and relatives, computer accessories, a waterproof safe, camping gear, household products and of course lots of photography accessories.
I am now a Amazon Prime member. But enough of all that. What about the Rebel t3i vs t4i comparison? Here is what I found. I did my normal in-depth reading of many reviews on both cameras and looked at the review numbers.
I calculated my own Canon Geek rating index and here are the results:. These are both outstanding cameras with a lot of raving fans. The Canon t3i also had twice as many reviews, indicating that is substantially more popular in terms of total number of actual buyers.
The t4i produces slightly sharper images only because of the Digic 5 processor. If you do any post-capture image sharpening on your own, than this difference simply does not matter. If you don't want to adjust any sharpness on the images that come straight out of the camera, then this comparison matters. The t4i has a faster frame rate of 5. If you are shooting any action sequence photos this is an advantage in favor of the Rebel t4i. They both have an 18 megapixel sensor, the LCD screen size is the same, they are the same size and weight, they have the same number of auto-focus points, and the video resolutions are the same.
You can also browse the entire menu with the touch of a finger. Additionally, the new model carries significant improvements that make it much more modern than its predecessor, such as the touchscreen interface, a shutter speed of less than 5 fps, ISO sensitivity of up to 25,, continuous AF mode video, in short, this is a camera that attracts both novice and more experienced photographers. I was, however, disappointed by the AF performance in live view: continuous AF in movie mode is too error-prone to focus.
The performance of AF are still very small compared to that of some models of the mirrorless Nikos. These disappointing results in live view also raise real concerns for the arrival of the first Canon mirrorless camera EOS-M , which is based largely on the T4i. It must be said that in optimal light, focus of the Rebel T4i is almost two times faster than the focus of the T3i. My final judgment on the Canon Rebel T4i is positive; I recommend buying, especially for photographers who want to enter the world of SLR for the first time.
All Educational Posts. We keep your data private and never sell it. Read our Privacy Policy. Remember Me. Sign In. Lost password? Create an account. A password will be emailed to you. Enter username or email. This website uses cookies to improve your experience.
We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Close Privacy Overview This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website.
These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent.
0コメント