When was ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny disproved
If so, then you understand the basic idea of phylogeny. Actually, it is the namesake of recapitulation theory. Recapitulation theory posits that the development of individual organisms ontogeny follows recapitulates the same phases of the evolution of larger ancestral groups of related organisms phylogeny. Applying this theory loosely, a seedling of a recently speciated flowering plant something that recently evolved to be a species would, throughout its embryological development, mimic the morphology of more ancestral plants—or plants that evolved in earlier times.
In theory, then, a young flowering plant might go through developmental stages that look like a moss or early land plant , then a fern or other vascular plants , then a gymnosperm or other seed plants , and so on.
Learn more about evolution and development in context: Why the eye? Find additional lessons, activities, videos, and articles that focus on development. Subscribe to our newsletter. Email Facebook Twitter. Learning about phylogeny from ontogeny By studying ontogeny the development of embryos , scientists can learn about the evolutionary history of organisms. Not recapitulation In the late s some scientists felt that ontogeny not only could reveal something about evolutionary history, but that it also preserved a step-by-step record of that history.
The evolutionary study of embryos reached a peak in the late s thanks primarily to the efforts of one extraordinarily gifted, though not entirely honest, scientist named Ernst Haeckel left. Haeckel believed that, over the course of time, evolution added new stages to produce new life forms. Thus, embryonic development was actually a record of evolutionary history. The single cell corresponded to amoeba-like ancestors, developing eventually into a sea squirt, a fish, and so on. Haeckel was so convinced of his Biogenetic Law that he was willing to bend evidence to support it.
The truth is that the development of embryos does not fit into the strict progression that Haeckel claimed. Echidnas, for example, develop their limbs much later than most other mammals. Cope, Edward. New York: D. Appleton and Co. Darwin, Charles R. London: John Murray Publishing House, Gould, Stephen J. Ontogeny and Phylogeny.
Cambridge: Harvard University Press , The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Haeckel, Ernst. Generelle morphologie der organismen [ General Morphology of the Organisms ]. Berlin: G. Reimer, Anthropogenie: oder, Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen.
Leibzig: Engelmann, His, Wilhelm. Hopwood, Nick. Keibel, Franz. Jena: G. Fischer, Lamarck, John Baptiste. Philosophie Zoologique [ Zoological Philosophy ]. Paris: Duminil-Lesueur, Paris: J.
0コメント